<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No mas, Natomas.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/no-mas-natomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/no-mas-natomas/</link>
	<description>A different perspective on life in Sacramento</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nanny Goats</title>
		<link>http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/no-mas-natomas/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanny Goats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/?p=171#comment-131</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always about money. Imagination and culture costs too much money. Cookie-cutter development is in the developers&#039; financial interest, not the residents.

Poor red-headed step child Natomas. Awwwww.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always about money. Imagination and culture costs too much money. Cookie-cutter development is in the developers&#8217; financial interest, not the residents.</p>
<p>Poor red-headed step child Natomas. Awwwww.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/no-mas-natomas/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://6degreessacramento.wordpress.com/?p=171#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Here is the reason for the cookie-cutter approach to Shopping Center development. Our City Council take the &quot;if they have money and are willing to put it where we tell them, they can put a glorified outhouse on location and we don&#039;t care a crap&quot; approach to city planning. 

For one brief moment in 2001, the Council turned down a developer who was going to bring in a huge shopping center across from Wal-Mart. We all cheered. Then they saw the lost revenue and approved EVERY SINGLE PROJECT that came up to them ever since. 

City planning means planning not prostituting to developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the reason for the cookie-cutter approach to Shopping Center development. Our City Council take the &#8220;if they have money and are willing to put it where we tell them, they can put a glorified outhouse on location and we don&#8217;t care a crap&#8221; approach to city planning. </p>
<p>For one brief moment in 2001, the Council turned down a developer who was going to bring in a huge shopping center across from Wal-Mart. We all cheered. Then they saw the lost revenue and approved EVERY SINGLE PROJECT that came up to them ever since. </p>
<p>City planning means planning not prostituting to developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
